Dear mAirList Council,
I have become a little unhappy with the current licensing scheme, for three reasons:
First, the registration process for getting a free license is very annoying, for the users as well as for me. Every day, I have to review all those requests, check if the addresses look authentic, and accept or request them. Once in a while, people try to fool me with names or addresses the obviously made up. Many people don’t understand why they have to provide their name, address or even e-mail address if the product is free anyway. And finally, I’m afraid that there is a number of people who request a free personal license and use it commercially then.
Second, when talking to commercial customers, it’s often hard to explain why the exact same product is free for one group of users and costs a few hundred Euros for the other group. (Actually, the reason is that - of course - mAirList is worth that price, but I’m endorsing people who use it without any commercial background.)
Finally, now that I quit my job at the university and started to work at a commercial company, my spare time has become significally less. I can only work on mAirList in the evenings, which means that I cannot do anything else in these evenings. If I want to keep up with the development in the usual manner, this will be quite an effort. I think a little more financial reward would appropriate.
I consider to change the licensing scheme, but I’m unsure what to do.
One option is to keep the curent licensing scheme (free for non-profit use, paid for commercial use), but don’t issue any license files anymore. mAirList would be unlocked right way. Pro: less work for me, all users still get the same set of features. Con: commercial users are no longer forced to get in touch with be but will have to do that voluntarily.
The second option is to introduce different editions of mAirList, e.g. “mAirList Free”, “mAirList Standard” and “mAirList Professional”. Some features would only be available in the “Standard” and “Professional” edition, and some only in the “Professional” edition. Although I have no idea which features to lock in which edition…
Do you think this would be fair to the non-profit users who are currently used to enjoy all of the features for free?
Torben